Error message

  • Notice: Undefined variable: background_image in include() (line 31 of /home/law261imageworks/public_html/sites/all/themes/cipzac/templates/node--article.tpl.php).
  • Notice: Only variables should be passed by reference in include() (line 56 of /home/law261imageworks/public_html/sites/all/themes/cipzac/templates/node--article.tpl.php).
  • Notice: Undefined variable: background_image in include() (line 31 of /home/law261imageworks/public_html/sites/all/themes/cipzac/templates/node--article.tpl.php).
  • Notice: Only variables should be passed by reference in include() (line 56 of /home/law261imageworks/public_html/sites/all/themes/cipzac/templates/node--article.tpl.php).

January 2018

Governor Malloy created the Connecticut State Department on Aging in 2013.  It consisted of two parts: (1) The State Unit on Aging; and (2) The Long Term Care Ombudsman Program.  The State Unit on Aging administers several programs for older Connecticut residents such as in-home services, home-delivered meals, senior community employment, health insurance counseling and respite care for caregivers.  The Long Term Care Ombudsman advocates for people living in nursing homes, residential care homes and assisted living communities.  The Ombudsman seeks to improve the quality of life and care for seniors living in those facilities.

To provide these services, the State Department on Aging conducts needs assessments of seniors.  The Department surveys methods of various services and how those services are delivered.  Further, it evaluates and monitors those services.  It also maintains a data-base of information and service providers for the public.  Finally, it collaborates with other agencies to provide various services to Connecticut’s seniors.  Ultimately, the goal of the State Department on Aging was to empower older people to enable them to live fuller and more independent lives and to provide leadership on issues facing older Connecticut residents.

On November 6, 2017, the Governor consolidated the State Department on Aging with the State Department of Rehabilitation Services (“DRS”).  The State Unit on Aging and the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs will continue to remain together under DRS.

Undoubtedly, keeping the State Unit on Aging and the Long Term Care Ombudsman Program together – under one roof – has been a source of relief to many people. This “shell game” of shifting and combining state agencies is clearly designed to save money at a time when Connecticut government undergoes austere measures. We hope this consolidation will not reduce the State’s commitment to providing services to seniors.  The website for the State Department on Aging remains live today but may close by June 30, 2018, when the fiscal year ends. 

If you have questions related to what you’ve learned in this blog or would like to learn more about the changes to the Connecticut State Department on Aging, please don’t hesitate to call the elder law attorneys at Cipparone & Zaccaro, PC.  

At Cipparone & Zaccaro, we regularly receive a call from a child who wants to assist his or her parent with an estate plan.  Often, the child schedules an appointment for us to meet with the parent or the child brings the parent to our law office.   

In the first meeting, we must clarify who our client is.  In many cases, the child is already one of our clients.  As you can imagine, this creates an ethical dilemma that must be carefully navigated. When a parent hires one of our lawyers to create an estate plan, we make it clear that the parent is the only one to whom we owe a duty of competence, diligence, loyalty and confidentiality. We have this duty regardless of who pays our fee.

Initially, many people are surprised at learning that we have an ethical dilemma.  The child helping the parent may be more involved with the parent’s care than other siblings.  Nevertheless, the lawyer’s duty is to make it clear that in order to avoid any potential conflicts of interest or any appearances of impropriety, the firm only represents the parent when drafting the parent’s estate plan.

A lawyer has a duty to keep a client’s confidences.  This means the lawyer has to protect information and communications between the parent and the lawyer by keeping them confidential.  At that point, the child may be asked to stay in the waiting room while the lawyer meets with the parent.  This practice is purposely done for the parent’s protection, which is a goal that everyone agrees on.  Meeting with the parent privately not only gives that person the opportunity to think about what they want and explain it to the lawyer but it also provides the lawyer with assurances that the client really understands what’s going on and is making choices that aren’t influenced by anyone else.  

If the child were in the same room as the parent and the lawyer, did most of the talking, and answered most of the questions, it would be very difficult for the lawyer to determine whether the wishes conveyed were those of the parent or the child.  If one child is allowed to participate in the discussion, the other children of the parent could challenge the estate plan at a later date.  This can lead to family feuds and no one wants their estate plan to cause division within their family.

Obviously, there will be times when we – the lawyers – will conclude that the parent does not have the capacity to sign estate planning documents.  In that case, our advice will include recommending other options to the client and their family.  Ultimately, however, our role is to draft an estate plan that captures the parent’s true intent.

The safer practice is for the child to stay in the waiting room while the parent consults with the lawyer.  This practice greatly decreases the chances of a subsequent legal challenge.  The lawyer does not want the parent’s Will or Trust challenged at a later time because the lawyer thought it was okay to allow a child to participate in the parent’s estate plan.  

If you have questions related to our ethical duties, please don’t hesitate to call the estate planning attorneys at Cipparone & Zaccaro, PC.